Google eSouls artificial intelligence brainstorming

(2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)

 Loading ...

Yesterday during a leadeship simulcast event, watching an interview with Irene Au on Google brainstorming sessions, I was thinking at the opportunity to automate a bit the brainstorming process. In fact this might really lead to some form of internet artificial intelligence thinking.

So, for example, let’s assume that bloggers or twitters or whomever is adding thoughts to the net will have the messages automatically stored in a kind of personal agent chatterbot - their eSoul - whom at a certain point will get to capture to a good extent their personality and creativity. Then, we, or Google or some large internet company with enough computing power, maybe Amazon with EC2, should run some “thinking ” processes similar to those in the human brain, that is automatic conversations between these eSouls. You know, when we are alone, we brainstorm by talking and questioning ourselves. The good thing is that these eSouls should be able to run day and night in a kind of indexing thought discussions processes somehow similar to our subconscient thinking. Sure the company and those particular esouls should be able to bring the dialogues to surface if they want, to store them and to use them later as reference in other dialogues. Infact this could become some sort of huge internet brain using and recombining existing human thoughts and with enough scoring and filtering being able to really conduct intelligent dialogues with any real human. Such a system will be similar to a mamouth Amazon’s Mechanical Turks engine where thousands or millions of bloggers will provide the creative answers needed for the internet AI thinking engine.

Sure this is not easy to switch on overnight and I think adding more tags and eventually the key questions answered by your messages will help a lot. Can we do that automatically?

The missing link as I blogged previously will be the focusing process, which I see it related to following objectives and planning and scheduling next questions of the dialogue in order to facilitate the answer we really need. It should be some form of feedback question like “Are we there yet? Did we reached the objective and answered the problem?”. That should include a form of scoring the answers. Maybe this scoring can be automated too…

This could be a shortcut (?) to the awed or feared singularity Ray Kurzweil is talking about…

What do you think? Will you sell your eSoul on the net to sweat day and night on internet subconscient thinking?

Posted in Artificial Intelligence, Technology, digital life, services |  Email This Post |

Great article about installing mini SAP

(6 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)

 Loading ...

Following the previous rambling on AIML, I think that the mind planning process could and likely is as complex, for many of us as a full ERP system. I’d like to explore the way to connect the 2 technologies, kind of use SAP for planning and AIML for dialog. As a big fun of free software, here is a great article for downloading and installing mini SAP:

“SAP has been offering a trial system called Mini SAP for many years. It’s still a powerful application to run on your home computer, for training purposes, to try out new things, or to create customer demonstrations. This article will show you how to get the most out of it. This tutorial is written both for absolute ABAP and SAP beginners, as well as experienced SAP users who don’t know how to set up the trial system.”

Interesting isn’t it?

from: heidoc.net

Posted in Uncategorized |  Email This Post |

Religion, Objectives, Learning and smart planning in Artificial Intelligence

(7 votes, average: 3.86 out of 5)

 Loading ...

Studying the impressive results of AIML, which is supported also by our SitePal eSoul, I was asking myself what would be the next steps to move forward in AI? (As Dr Richard Wallace observed in one of the longest interviews on slashdot.org there is not to much progress outside AIML, and considering that the remark was from 2002, we can safely say that AIML, too, is not progressing to fast…).

One first thing to observe is that I asked this myself, and a lot of deductions and lernings I get this way, so, one thing would be to adapt AIML to allow chatbots to talk to themselves and make some deductions out of their own questions.

Secondly, the questions and answers need to follow a certain objectives and the robot should be capable of auto-scheduling his own time and dedicating more time to the most promising self dialogs. Which means some planning abilities and some judgement on value of new learnings and deductions. Then, in order to not artificially limit the eSoul in his life journey, some very basic religious or philosophical questions must be at the root of the cognitive tree in the digital mind, left to be answered and explored, as humans are, by the bot in order to ensure a never ending quest on learning about creator, universe, origin of life, etc.

Finally bots have to be able to socialize and exchange learnings in some sort of market place, sure through the internet.

If we’ll enable these in AIML then we’ll have plenty of eSouls swarming the net…

Posted in Uncategorized |  Email This Post |